<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fixing Broken Windows with Ratcheting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skizz.biz/blog/2008/03/11/fixing-broken-windows-with-ratcheting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skizz.biz/blog/2008/03/11/fixing-broken-windows-with-ratcheting/</link>
	<description>Chris Stevenson's blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Goldobin</title>
		<link>http://skizz.biz/blog/2008/03/11/fixing-broken-windows-with-ratcheting/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Goldobin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skizz.biz/blog/2008/03/12/fixing-broken-windows-with-ratcheting/#comment-929</guid>
		<description>Did you actually implement a hook to fail a build automatically if metrics goes down? It makes a great sense fir the build time but for test coverage there may be eligible numbers drop. like some tests are not make sense anymore... I guess if you decided just to take off coverage for some class because it doesn't work and you have no time to fix it - it's a bad excuse :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you actually implement a hook to fail a build automatically if metrics goes down? It makes a great sense fir the build time but for test coverage there may be eligible numbers drop. like some tests are not make sense anymore&#8230; I guess if you decided just to take off coverage for some class because it doesn&#8217;t work and you have no time to fix it - it&#8217;s a bad excuse :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
